The Chronicle - ‘Fledermaus’ camps out at Hofstra
College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

‘Fledermaus’ camps out at Hofstra

News Editor

Published: Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Updated: Monday, March 8, 2010 10:03

Is it impossible for Hofstra Opera Theatre to stage a production that’s camp free? Last year’s production, “L’incoronazione di Poppea,” couldn’t figure out what time period in which it belonged. This year’s selection, Johann Strauss’ pretty “Die Fledermaus,” succeeded far greater in terms of period, but the camp factor was still there.

Directed by Hofstra Opera Theatre impresario Isabel Milenski (who also directed “Poppea,”) this “Fledermaus” fashioned a “new” script around Strauss’ score (the original book was by Carl Haffner and Richard Genee, who also wrote the lyrics). New, of course, is a relative term. The period was “updated” to the 1990s, modern references flying abound, and the level of camp was extraordinarily high. Too high. Much too high.

“Fledermaus,” (“The Bat,” in English) tells of an elaborate trick played on a gentleman named Eisenstein, by his dear friend Falke. Eisenstein is set to spend eight days imprisoned. Rosalinda, his wife, is having an affair with Alfred (who, in this production, is a poolboy). When the police chief arrives to arrest Eisenstein, Alfred takes his place, at Rosalinda’s urging. Later, at a party for one Prince Orlofsky, more entanglements are revealed as the guests revel in the joy of champagne.

Opera singers aren’t the most convincing actors, and while the cast didn’t necessarily deliver the cheeseball dialogue with the conviction that, say, actors would, they did, (thankfully), sing very well. Junior Christina Pecce (who alternated the role of Rosalinda with Josephine Delledera) possesses a pleasing soprano and a demeanor that oozes sex appeal. Michael Franzone, a recent graduate, makes for an appealing Eisenstein, with an equally appealing tenor.

Mario Arevalo (a ringer brought in by the music department) is wonderful as the wrongly jailed Alfred. And senior Jared Berry nearly ran away with the whole thing as the police chief, in one scene dancing with two pistols and, in another, sporting a red boa (costumes, by Christina Bullard, fit the period and played up the camp factor.)

Jian Jung’s incredibly attractive set and Jeanette Yew’s lighting were the least campy of everything – lovely and toned down. Hopefully next year’s selection will follow that theme.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

20 comments

Disappointed
Fri Mar 5 2010 21:42
Apparently the spellcheck wasn't working when the editors went in and "updated" the article on February 16. While they were able to correct the spelling of "Johann," the word "Hofstra" is now spelled wrong in the second paragraph. Did they not learn their lesson the first time around? Perhaps what The Chronicle needs is a new copy-editor.
Anonymous
Sun Feb 28 2010 21:45
In response to a comment below, characters should only be reviewed if good. Unfortunately, the Friday/Sunday cast of the Prince Orlofsky was nothing worthy of noting.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 23:17
For the record, Mr. Gordon must have went in and made some alterations, because originally Johann Strauss was spelled Johan Strauss. Nice cover up. God help this guy if he finds himself in a room with a bunch of music majors!
Anonymous
Tue Feb 23 2010 00:46
opera review FAIL
Anonymous
Thu Feb 18 2010 16:14
I was a member of the pit orchestra for Die Fledermaus, so my opinion is probably biased. But I was very disappointed that this review made no mention of the music, which I would think would be central to a review of an opera. I was also very confused about what you meant by "campy", and since you used the term 6 times in a 6 paragraph review, I really don't know what you were going for here. The fact is, Adams playhouse was near-packed for all 3 performances, which would indicate to me a successful show that people enjoyed very much. The work that everyone put into this opera was incredible, and it's a shame that this review is all that the Hofstra campus at large knows about our production of Die Fledermaus.

Also, you no mention of Prince Orlofsky? For shame.

Perplexed
Tue Feb 16 2010 14:31
I was not at all affiliated with Hofstra's Die Fledermaus, and I must concur with all of the below comments. Having read this article, without having seen the opera in question, I am more inclined to believe that the critic didn't understand what he was seeing. As someone with a modest knowledge of opera, I found myself thinking "Who is this guy and why should I trust his opinions?" I'll put it this way - its as if reading a review of a jazz performance in which the critic said "The musician who played the instrument thats big and black and has those white keys on it was bad, but the guy with the big wooden thing with strings was awesome." If you know nothing about opera, how can you critic the musical performances, the plot, the sets, or the story?
David Gordon
Tue Feb 16 2010 14:00
Do I know as much as I should about opera? No. Should I have written this article? Probably not, but I offer the fact that, on our staff, I have the most experience in terms of the arts. Are there people who could have done a far better job than I? There are always people who will be better than you at something. But because of The Chronicle’s lack of writers, and the fact that “Fellow Journalist” and all the other purported “journalists” who have posted are not on our staff (to my knowledge), the task fell to me.

I invite you, if you’re still dissatisfied, to discuss this with me in person, in our office, Room 203 of the Student Center. And if you’d like to start writing, you’re more than welcome.

Anonymous
Tue Feb 16 2010 13:41
Saying opera singers aren't the most convincing actors is quite a claim, since you hardly pass as a convincing journalist.
Trying to put on a student opera production is by no means easy. At Hofstra, the budget is EXTREMELY low since preference is given to the theater department. Budgets for staged operas are extremely high, and to stage a traditionally costumed and set opera is next to impossible.
I am a graduate of the music department, and I have to say, I am proud of the direction in which the productions have been going. The opera program was nearly non-existent 10 years ago, and in that small amount of time, they have managed to produce some really wonderful singers who have gone on to prestigious graduate school and/or gone on to begin a successful career in the world of classical singing. Training for acting in the program was hardly there in the beginning, and, while this is just my opinion, the symmetry between the singing and acting is on its way to being quite extraordinary.
I am wondering if you at all bothered to read the program. Ms. Milenski took the time to explain why she set the opera in that time period, and history behind it, etc. Die Fledermaus is SUPPOSED to be funny, and silly. It's a farce. While opera is constantly being criticized for being too traditional and even boring, the cast and crew took the time to give it a modern feel, bring on a different approach to appeal to a broader audience, and did a fantastic job. There were more people in the audience for this opera (Friday night when I attended, at least) than had been in previous years.
Would you have said it was "campy" had it been billed as a musical theater show instead of an opera (actually, technically an operetta, but I may be getting to technical for you)? Open up your mind a little bit to what the cast and crew were trying to bring. Check the facts (such as how to spell composers' names, technical terms for the "lyrics," etc.), do the homework on the production, and bring an unbiased perspective. As someone writing for the Hofstra Chronicle, I would think you probably have some interest in writing, and being respected for such writing (correct me if I'm wrong). If you are going to have any sort of respectable career in journalism (or editor, etc), do the work. If not, you can always go write for the New York Post or Daily News.
-Grateful former student
Anonymous
Tue Feb 16 2010 13:25
I do not blame for Mr. Gordon for this review because whenever you move a piece from its time period it always feels out of place. Which in this case the piece did feel very cheesy and campy. Just look at Romeo and Juliet with Leonardo DiCaprio
JSA
Tue Feb 16 2010 13:08
Maybe he has the balls to attach his name to this article, but he still sucks as a writer and especially as a critic. Sure he has the right to voice his opinion, but he needs to support his opinion with facts. And nobody is going to buy any argument this imbecile makes when he can't even spell the name of the composer. Who were the idiots that made him editor. I'm assuming politics correct? And if you're such a god damn "perfectionist" as you state in your interview for Hofstra, then why don't you check the spelling of a name? As a journalist, one of the first things that you are told is to check the spelling of names so that you don't misrepresent anyone. Clearly this was written in haste for the sake of writing it and without any concern for precision and much less "perfection." By the way, I am pretty sure that there are a bunch of journalism majors that are opera enthusiasts (based on the above comments) and I am sure that as a serious journalistic organization (because I assume that the Chronicle staff thinks of the newspaper as a serious publication), it is essential to use the best trained people (that is, the ones that know about the material they will be working on) for these sorts of assignments. The fact that there are many angry comments on this page stands to show that people are unhappy with the review, not because it was a negative review, but because it is clear that the writer was ignorant to the subject matter. More embarrassing is the fact that he is supposed to be an editor, which would create the expectation that he knows what he is doing. Clearly this is not the case and clearly the Chronicle staff never thought it through when they sent a theater critic (a bad one to be sure) to critique opera. Get it into your heads people! Opera does not equal theater and much of the insanity going on in the opera world at the present moment is the result of theater directors thinking that they can make the jump from one form to the other without any change. This is not the case.

As has been stated, Mr. Gordon also made no effort to write about the music, which I might add, is a fundamental part of opera if not its most important aspect. An opera review with no mention of music is pretty pathetic to say the least. Finally, the "camp" factor that keeps getting thrown around in this article. You never actually defined the term, but assumed that the readers would understand exactly what you meant by "campy." Do you mean ironic, theatrical? Or did you mean bad taste, banal, mediocre? Or do you mean the homosexual art culture known as camp? I believe that part of the reason for the hostility maybe the fact that YOU NEVER DEFINED THE TERM and the term has many meanings attached to it. And if the audience misinterpreted the intention, you only have yourself to blame.

I request that you atone for your displayed ineptitude by responding to this thread, whether it be to defend yourself, or to apologize for this blunder.

Signed,

An opera lover

Anonymous
Tue Feb 16 2010 11:34
at least one good thing about you Mr. David Gordon is that you have the balls to put your name on this article.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 16 2010 11:01
Mr. Gordon,

As a person who does not particularly follow opera and did NOT participate in this year's opera, I can tell you that I at least did my research before going to see it.
Often, when a journalist isn't sure of how to describe something, they use terminology that doesn't necessarily have any real meaning toward the subject at hand-it just confuses the reader and makes YOU sound smarter.
It is because of people like you, who cannot appreciate the beauty and historical importance of opera, that opera needs to be re-scored and updated for the modern world. Opera is not a musical, as you made it seem; it is something else altogether. If you want to try me, try this: Rent, the musical, is a modern musical version of La Boheme-an opera. Compare Rent to Die Fledermaus; there is not much credible similarity.

Open your eyes to things you may not know-I hope you are taking these comments in good stride and re-evaluating your work in general.

Anonymous
Tue Feb 16 2010 11:00
It's easy to be ignorant and snarky when no one cares, David, but this displays a real lack of knowledge. The whole point of this was to be over the top, it's the nature of this opera. If you don't know what you're talking about, don't bother reviewing something, from one journalist to another.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 16 2010 09:29
Unfortunately, I missed the opera production this year. However, I have to agree with the other comments. Your article makes it quite clear that you know nothing about opera and did not make much of an attempt to educate yourself on the subject. Opera singers aren't the most convincing actors? I must say that is a very interesting remark to make, and it makes it clear that your only knowledge of opera is from satiric references to it in pop culture. Before movies existed, there were operas. (Apparently, according to you, actors who aren't fabulous singers must automatically be better actors than singing ones... Do me a favor. Give them some of the intense or out-of-this-world drama or sophisticated comedy that you have in an opera...without even having to worry about notes, rhythms, tempo, dynamics, support, and all the intricacies that make those things lock into place...as well as how the use of your body is monopolized by meeting those requirements) On top of that, I can't believe you didn't even mention a single thing that went on in the pit! This is the most superficial opera review I've ever read. If you ever intend to review an opera production anywhere again (,which I doubt is very likely), I advise you to take Opera History with Dr. Carter, if it is still being offered. Oh, and if you continue to write, you should probably work on your sense of humour.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 16 2010 08:46
Since when does a review of an opera not include one single reference to the actual MUSICAL performance - is it maybe because the reviewer - as any critic - is actually incompetent?
Anonymous
Mon Feb 15 2010 21:46
David F-ing Gorden if you do not know anything about a subject the do not open your mouth. You clearly do not anything about Opera and should go back to your so-called "News" section
A fellow journalist
Mon Feb 15 2010 21:24
Mr. Gordon,

After a few conversations with you, I recall you telling me that you explicitly had no interest in opera. Which makes me wonder why you would even bother to review Fledermaus and then critique it without any basis to do so. Furthermore, you need to have a clearer understanding of the terminology that you employ when writing. Being "campy" does not necessarily imply negativity. There is a great wealth of great art that is "campy" in fact.

Furthermore, in the opera world, we no longer use the term "opera singer," but instead "singing actor." Yes opera singers are trained to act. Just because you did not feel that the performers were brilliant actors gives you no right to state the stereotypical idea that "singing actors" don't make for good actors. I suggest that before your write a pretentious article such as this one, you go out and watch opera and EDUCATE your ignorant mind. And if you don't like opera, then do the world a favor and don't try and do something that you are clearly incapable of doing: writing about opera.

Opera Enthusiast and Fellow Journalist
Mon Feb 15 2010 21:11
A general rule of thumb in journalism is that written articles need to be factual and accurate before they go to print. One important aspect of accuracy is spelling. Because you editors over there at The Chronicle didn't catch these the first time, here is a list of a few inaccurate items included in David Gordon's review (the first of which, of course, has already been pointed out by the other commenters):

-The opera was composed by JOHANN Strauss, not JOHAN
-When discussing an opera, there are no LYRICS. There is the LIBRETTO.
-Opera singers are, in fact, actors as well.

Mr. Gordon should do his homework before attempting to review a production in a performance genre he clearly is not familiar with. The "campy" feel he continually refers to yet fails to define might actually be intended. This opera, as intended by Strauss and the Hofstra Opera Theatre, is a comedic satire. The over-the-top nature of the set, acting, and characters is exactly what makes Die Fledermaus enjoyable. And whether Mr. Gordon liked the production or not, he as the reviewer has an obligation to his audience to at least acknowledge the genre in which the opera exists.

Signed,
Opera Enthusiast and Fellow Journalist

Anonymous
Sat Feb 6 2010 11:08
I'm sorry, but this is the stupidest thing I've read in a while. Grammatical mistakes are abundant, including that which has already been pointed out, JOHANN Strauss. I want to know who made this David Gordon an EDITOR.

You constantly talk about this period conflict, yet I'm sure most of the readers are confused...when WAS this opera supposed to take place? You can't put down Isabel's interpretation and the fact that it is set in the 1990's if you don't even know for when the opera was originally written.

Would you like to elaborate on what "camp-free" and "camp factor" means? I can't recall if you mentioned this in your last opera review (though I remember it being equally ignorant) but I'm sure newer readers are unclear about what you mean.

And finally, if you knew anything about interpreting talent, you'd know that the police chief SURELY didn't nearly "run away with the whole thing." (What is "thing" anyways? You mean, the opera?)

Signed, incredibly disgruntled.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 5 2010 21:22
Looks like they'll let anyone review operas these days.

Fledermaus was one of the most amazing shows Hofstra Opera Theater has seen in a very long time. Clearly you don't know anything about opera because Fledermaus is supposed to be a comedy. It's supposed to be fun/funny/silly.

Where do you come off saying that opera singers are not actors? Have you actually seen an opera or are you just making things up as you go along?

PS-Reason # 39849348 you shouldn't be writing reviews on operas...or just writing in general: It's JOHANN Strauss, not JOHAN.







log out